WC3 TrackerMapsX Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom vs Zombie Defense
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom vs Zombie Defense

Zombie Defense is the more popular of the two, with 4,912 recorded sessions versus 25. Zombie Defense averages more players per lobby (2.7 vs 2.3), suggesting larger games. X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. Over the past 30 days, Zombie Defense has seen more activity.

X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom Zombie Defense
Head to Head
MetricX Hero Siege Imposible Con ZoomZombie Defense
Total sessions254,912
Unique hosts9281
Avg players/lobby2.32.7
Avg lobby open time0.9 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)122,308
Tracked versions130
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 19, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
22
2,307
Jun 26
13
2,612

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom and Zombie Defense on Warcraft 3

Zombie Defense is more popular, with 4,912 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 25 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Zombie Defense has more players per lobby on average (2.7) than X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom (2.3).
X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Zombie Defense has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,308 vs 12). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom has been hosted by 9 unique BattleTags and Zombie Defense by 281. Zombie Defense has the wider host base.