WC3 Tracker›Maps›Warofraces vs X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Warofraces vs X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 4,741 recorded sessions versus 25. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.4 vs 2.3), suggesting larger games. X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Warofraces X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom
Head to Head
MetricWarofracesX Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom
Total sessions4,741 ▲25
Unique hosts244 ▲9
Avg players/lobby4.4 ▲2.3
Avg lobby open time4 min0.9 min ▲
Sessions (30d)1,577 ▲5
Tracked versions231
Last hostedJun 15, 2026Jun 14, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
1,531
22
Jun 26
1,947
13
Explore Each Map
Warofraces full stats → X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom full stats → Watch live Warofraces lobbies Watch live X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Warofraces and X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 4,741 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 25 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.4) than X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom (2.3).
X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,577 vs 5). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Warofraces has been hosted by 244 unique BattleTags and X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom by 9. Warofraces has the wider host base.