WC3 TrackerMapsV 2.0(Beta 3) vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

V 2.0(Beta 3) vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.6), suggesting larger games. V 2.0(Beta 3) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

V 2.0(Beta 3) Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricV 2.0(Beta 3)Warofraces
Total sessions57,637
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby3.64.6
Avg lobby open time1.2 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,584
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJun 25, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
5
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,352

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing V 2.0(Beta 3) and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than V 2.0(Beta 3) (3.6).
V 2.0(Beta 3) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,584 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
V 2.0(Beta 3) has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.