WC3 TrackerMapsSystem Maul vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

System Maul vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 7. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.2 min for System Maul. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

System Maul Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricSystem MaulWarofraces
Total sessions77,636
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby3.14.6
Avg lobby open time5.2 min4 min
Sessions (30d)01,559
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJun 29, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
7
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,280

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing System Maul and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than System Maul (3.1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 5.2 min for System Maul. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,559 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
System Maul has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.