WC3 Tracker›Maps›Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 7. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricStar Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon ConquestWarofraces
Total sessions77,636 ▲
Unique hosts3258 ▲
Avg players/lobby1.94.6 ▲
Avg lobby open time0.8 min ▲4 min
Sessions (30d)31,567 ▲
Tracked versions437
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
5
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,274
Explore Each Map
Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest full stats → Warofraces full stats → Watch live Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest lobbies Watch live Warofraces lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest (1.9).
Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,567 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.