WC3 TrackerMapsSolar Conquest vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Solar Conquest vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,656 recorded sessions versus 21. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 20.6 min for Solar Conquest. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Solar Conquest Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricSolar ConquestWarofraces
Total sessions217,656
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby34.6
Avg lobby open time20.6 min4 min
Sessions (30d)11,682
Tracked versions437
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 12, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
13
1,531
Jun 26
8
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,634

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Solar Conquest and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,656 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 21 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Solar Conquest (3).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 20.6 min for Solar Conquest. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,682 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Solar Conquest has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.