WC3 Tracker›Maps›Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 10. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 19.8 min for Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricShadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.WWarofraces
Total sessions107,636 ▲
Unique hosts1258 ▲
Avg players/lobby44.6 ▲
Avg lobby open time19.8 min4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)01,574 ▲
Tracked versions137
Last hostedMay 26, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,226
Explore Each Map
Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W full stats → Warofraces full stats → Watch live Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W lobbies Watch live Warofraces lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 10 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W (4).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 19.8 min for Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,574 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Shadow Line Arena Beta V 1.0b.W has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.