WC3 TrackerMapsSfz vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Sfz vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 299. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.1), suggesting larger games. Sfz lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Sfz Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricSfzWarofraces
Total sessions2997,636
Unique hosts37258
Avg players/lobby2.14.6
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)541,574
Tracked versions2237
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
1,531
Jun 26
259
4,233
Jul 26
95
2,226

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Sfz and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 299 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Sfz (2.1).
Sfz lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,574 vs 54). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Sfz has been hosted by 37 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.