WC3 TrackerMapsRust And Rain V 1.0a.W vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 13.2 min for Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRust And Rain V 1.0a.WWarofraces
Total sessions57,637
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.44.6
Avg lobby open time13.2 min4 min
Sessions (30d)51,584
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
5
2,352

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W (1.4).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 13.2 min for Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,584 vs 5). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Rust And Rain V 1.0a.W has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.