WC3 TrackerMapsRun Kitty Run vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Run Kitty Run vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 47. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.8), suggesting larger games. Run Kitty Run lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Run Kitty Run Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRun Kitty RunWarofraces
Total sessions477,636
Unique hosts12258
Avg players/lobby2.84.6
Avg lobby open time2.6 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)71,576
Tracked versions2237
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
7
1,531
Jun 26
40
4,233
Jul 26
11
2,338

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Run Kitty Run and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 47 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Run Kitty Run (2.8).
Run Kitty Run lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,576 vs 7). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Run Kitty Run has been hosted by 12 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.