WC3 TrackerMapsRun Kitty Run Kwh (P) vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 7. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRun Kitty Run Kwh (P)Warofraces
Total sessions77,636
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby1.94.6
Avg lobby open time1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,574
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJun 23, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
7
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,226

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) (1.9).
Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,574 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Run Kitty Run Kwh (P) has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.