WC3 TrackerMapsRu Tcom vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ru Tcom vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 433. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Ru Tcom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Ru Tcom Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRu TcomWarofraces
Total sessions4337,636
Unique hosts21258
Avg players/lobby1.44.6
Avg lobby open time2 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)1271,571
Tracked versions1037
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
101
1,531
Jun 26
191
4,233
Jul 26
164
2,226

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ru Tcom and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 433 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Ru Tcom (1.4).
Ru Tcom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,571 vs 127). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ru Tcom has been hosted by 21 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.