WC3 TrackerMapsRough Survival In The Forest vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Rough Survival In The Forest vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 11. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.6), suggesting larger games. Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Rough Survival In The Forest Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRough Survival In The ForestWarofraces
Total sessions117,636
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby2.64.6
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)21,555
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
12
2,280

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Rough Survival In The Forest and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Rough Survival In The Forest (2.6).
Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,555 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Rough Survival In The Forest has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.