WC3 TrackerMapsRisk Next Gen vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Risk Next Gen vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 6. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 12.7 min for Risk Next Gen. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Risk Next Gen Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricRisk Next GenWarofraces
Total sessions67,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby14.6
Avg lobby open time12.7 min4 min
Sessions (30d)31,589
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
6
2,252

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Risk Next Gen and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 6 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Risk Next Gen (1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 12.7 min for Risk Next Gen. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,589 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Risk Next Gen has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.