WC3 Tracker›Maps›Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricQuenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x.Warofraces
Total sessions27,637 ▲
Unique hosts1258 ▲
Avg players/lobby14.6 ▲
Avg lobby open time0.8 min ▲4 min
Sessions (30d)21,582 ▲
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
2
2,367
Explore Each Map
Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. full stats → Warofraces full stats → Watch live Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. lobbies Watch live Warofraces lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. (1).
Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,582 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.