WC3 TrackerMapsQuenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 12,213 recorded sessions versus 2. Survivalchaosreborn averages more players per lobby (3.4 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricQuenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x.Survivalchaosreborn
Total sessions212,213
Unique hosts1553
Avg players/lobby13.4
Avg lobby open time0.8 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)23,211
Tracked versions139
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
2,769
Jun 26
0
10,783
Jul 26
2
4,814

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 12,213 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Survivalchaosreborn has more players per lobby on average (3.4) than Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. (1).
Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,211 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Quenta Silmarillion V 1[1].02.W 3x. has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 553. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.