WC3 TrackerMapsNightfallinfection vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Nightfallinfection vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,635 recorded sessions versus 26. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 11.6 min for Nightfallinfection. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Nightfallinfection Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricNightfallinfectionWarofraces
Total sessions267,635
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby24.6
Avg lobby open time11.6 min4 min
Sessions (30d)31,667
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJul 3, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
6
1,531
Jun 26
18
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,217

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Nightfallinfection and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,635 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 26 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Nightfallinfection (2).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 11.6 min for Nightfallinfection. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,667 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Nightfallinfection has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.