WC3 TrackerMapsNight Of The Dead Iii.E vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Night Of The Dead Iii.E vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 40. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.2), suggesting larger games. Night Of The Dead Iii.E lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Night Of The Dead Iii.E Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricNight Of The Dead Iii.EWarofraces
Total sessions407,636
Unique hosts5258
Avg players/lobby1.24.6
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)261,552
Tracked versions337
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
11
1,531
Jun 26
15
4,233
Jul 26
31
2,256

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Night Of The Dead Iii.E and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 40 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Night Of The Dead Iii.E (1.2).
Night Of The Dead Iii.E lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,552 vs 26). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Night Of The Dead Iii.E has been hosted by 5 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.