WC3 TrackerMapsNatures Wrath vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Natures Wrath vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 6. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.5), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.6 min for Natures Wrath. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Natures Wrath Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricNatures WrathWarofraces
Total sessions67,636
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby2.54.6
Avg lobby open time6.6 min4 min
Sessions (30d)41,589
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
4
1,531
Jun 26
7
4,233
Jul 26
4
2,252

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Natures Wrath and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 6 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Natures Wrath (2.5).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.6 min for Natures Wrath. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,589 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Natures Wrath has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.