Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 20. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.7), suggesting larger games. Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.
Comparing Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot and Warofraces on Warcraft 3
Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 20 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot (2.7).
Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,562 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.