WC3 Tracker›Maps›Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 12,189 recorded sessions versus 20. Survivalchaosreborn averages more players per lobby (3.4 vs 2.7), suggesting larger games. Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricMineralz 1.55(E) ProtSurvivalchaosreborn
Total sessions2012,189 ▲
Unique hosts2553 ▲
Avg players/lobby2.73.4 ▲
Avg lobby open time0.6 min ▲2.4 min
Sessions (30d)23,223 ▲
Tracked versions139
Last hostedJul 7, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
2,769
Jun 26
20
10,783
Jul 26
2
4,679
Explore Each Map
Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot full stats → Survivalchaosreborn full stats → Watch live Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot lobbies Watch live Survivalchaosreborn lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 12,189 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 20 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Survivalchaosreborn has more players per lobby on average (3.4) than Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot (2.7).
Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,223 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Mineralz 1.55(E) Prot has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 553. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.