WC3 TrackerMapsMidgard vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Midgard vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Midgard lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Midgard Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricMidgardWarofraces
Total sessions57,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.44.6
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,566
Tracked versions337
Last hostedJun 15, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
5
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,304

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Midgard and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Midgard (1.4).
Midgard lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,566 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Midgard has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.