WC3 TrackerMapsHell L vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Hell L vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Hell L lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Hell L Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricHell LWarofraces
Total sessions27,637
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby14.6
Avg lobby open time0.5 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,598
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
2
4,233
Jul 26
2
2,379

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Hell L and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Hell L (1).
Hell L lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,598 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Hell L has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.