WC3 TrackerMapsGlacialthaw vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Glacialthaw vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 45. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Glacialthaw lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Glacialthaw Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricGlacialthawWarofraces
Total sessions457,636
Unique hosts27258
Avg players/lobby1.44.6
Avg lobby open time1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)191,568
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
20
1,531
Jun 26
49
4,233
Jul 26
31
2,323

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Glacialthaw and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 45 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Glacialthaw (1.4).
Glacialthaw lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,568 vs 19). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Glacialthaw has been hosted by 27 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.