WC3 Tracker›Maps›Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 11. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.7), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.5 min for Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricGetgrinding Rpg Save Load AttemptWarofraces
Total sessions117,636 ▲
Unique hosts3258 ▲
Avg players/lobby1.74.6 ▲
Avg lobby open time6.5 min4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)11,554 ▲
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
2
1,531
Jun 26
10
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,256
Explore Each Map
Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt full stats → Warofraces full stats → Watch live Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt lobbies Watch live Warofraces lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt (1.7).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.5 min for Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,554 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Getgrinding Rpg Save Load Attempt has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.