WC3 TrackerMapsFtw vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ftw vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 61. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Ftw lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Ftw Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricFtwWarofraces
Total sessions617,636
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby1.54.6
Avg lobby open time1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)11,561
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
2
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,274

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ftw and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 61 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Ftw (1.5).
Ftw lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,561 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ftw has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.