WC3 Tracker›Maps›Fictional Showdown Beta Test vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Fictional Showdown Beta Test vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 12,190 recorded sessions versus 6. Fictional Showdown Beta Test averages more players per lobby (4 vs 3.4), suggesting larger games. Fictional Showdown Beta Test lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Fictional Showdown Beta Test Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricFictional Showdown Beta TestSurvivalchaosreborn
Total sessions612,190 ▲
Unique hosts3553 ▲
Avg players/lobby4 ▲3.4
Avg lobby open time1.1 min ▲2.4 min
Sessions (30d)03,218 ▲
Tracked versions139
Last hostedJun 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3
2,769
Jun 26
2
10,783
Jul 26
0
4,684
Explore Each Map
Fictional Showdown Beta Test full stats → Survivalchaosreborn full stats → Watch live Fictional Showdown Beta Test lobbies Watch live Survivalchaosreborn lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Fictional Showdown Beta Test and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 12,190 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 6 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Fictional Showdown Beta Test has more players per lobby on average (4) than Survivalchaosreborn (3.4).
Fictional Showdown Beta Test lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 2.4 min for Survivalchaosreborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,218 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Fictional Showdown Beta Test has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 553. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.