WC3 TrackerMapsFall Of Rome vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Fall Of Rome vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 5. Fall Of Rome averages more players per lobby (7.8 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 21 min for Fall Of Rome. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Fall Of Rome Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricFall Of RomeWarofraces
Total sessions57,636
Unique hosts3258
Avg players/lobby7.8 4.6
Avg lobby open time21 min4 min
Sessions (30d)31,589
Tracked versions337
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,252

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Fall Of Rome and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Fall Of Rome has more players per lobby on average (7.8) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 21 min for Fall Of Rome. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,589 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Fall Of Rome has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.