WC3 TrackerMapsDota vs Rough Survival In The Forest
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Dota vs Rough Survival In The Forest

Dota is the more popular of the two, with 8,318 recorded sessions versus 11. Dota averages more players per lobby (7 vs 2.6), suggesting larger games. Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 8.6 min for Dota. Over the past 30 days, Dota has seen more activity.

Dota Rough Survival In The Forest
Head to Head
MetricDotaRough Survival In The Forest
Total sessions8,318 11
Unique hosts457 3
Avg players/lobby7 2.6
Avg lobby open time8.6 min0.8 min
Sessions (30d)4,106 2
Tracked versions1731
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3,725
0
Jun 26
11,463
0
Jul 26
5,911
12

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Dota and Rough Survival In The Forest on Warcraft 3

Dota is more popular, with 8,318 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Dota has more players per lobby on average (7) than Rough Survival In The Forest (2.6).
Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 8.6 min for Dota. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Dota has had more sessions in the last 30 days (4,106 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Dota has been hosted by 457 unique BattleTags and Rough Survival In The Forest by 3. Dota has the wider host base.