WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 22,023 recorded sessions versus 25. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.3), suggesting larger games. X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeX Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom
Total sessions22,023 ▲25
Unique hosts1,615 ▲9
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲2.3
Avg lobby open time1.6 min0.9 min ▲
Sessions (30d)9,625 ▲12
Tracked versions811
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 19, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
22
Jun 26
14,084
13
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 22,023 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 25 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom (2.3).
X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,625 vs 12). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and X Hero Siege Imposible Con Zoom by 9. Direct Strike has the wider host base.