WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 22,210 recorded sessions versus 28. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.4), suggesting larger games. Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeTimeofdragons.Rpg Translated
Total sessions22,210 ▲28
Unique hosts1,615 ▲6
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲2.4
Avg lobby open time1.6 min1.4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)9,635 ▲28
Tracked versions811
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 16, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
5
Jun 26
14,271
28
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 22,210 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 28 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated (2.4).
Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,635 vs 28). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Timeofdragons.Rpg Translated by 6. Direct Strike has the wider host base.