WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Solar Conquest
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Solar Conquest

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 48,241 recorded sessions versus 21. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 20.6 min for Solar Conquest. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Solar Conquest
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeSolar Conquest
Total sessions48,241 21
Unique hosts1,615 3
Avg players/lobby5.3 3
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 20.6 min
Sessions (30d)10,070 1
Tracked versions1044
Last hostedJul 12, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
13
Jun 26
30,642
8
Jul 26
15,869
1

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Solar Conquest on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 48,241 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 21 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Solar Conquest (3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 20.6 min for Solar Conquest. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,070 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Solar Conquest by 3. Direct Strike has the wider host base.