WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 1. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeRu Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad)
Total sessions47,450 ▲1
Unique hosts1,615 ▲1
Avg players/lobby5.3 ▲1
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.2 min ▲
Sessions (30d)9,812 ▲1
Tracked versions1041
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 4, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
13,846
1
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) (1).
Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,812 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Ru Tcom 18.14e(Demon Remad) by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.