WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Mcfc
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Mcfc

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 69. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.4 min for Mcfc. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Mcfc
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeMcfc
Total sessions47,450 69
Unique hosts1,615 12
Avg players/lobby5.3 1.2
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 3.4 min
Sessions (30d)9,834 4
Tracked versions1046
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
41
Jun 26
30,642
77
Jul 26
13,846
9

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Mcfc on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 69 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Mcfc (1.2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.4 min for Mcfc. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,834 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Mcfc by 12. Direct Strike has the wider host base.