WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Large Battles Micro Training
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Large Battles Micro Training

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,430 recorded sessions versus 5. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Large Battles Micro Training lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Large Battles Micro Training
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeLarge Battles Micro Training
Total sessions47,430 ▲5
Unique hosts1,615 ▲1
Avg players/lobby5.3 ▲1.8
Avg lobby open time1.7 min1.4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)10,002 ▲0
Tracked versions1042
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jun 18, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
5
Jul 26
13,801
0
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Large Battles Micro Training full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Large Battles Micro Training lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Large Battles Micro Training on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,430 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Large Battles Micro Training (1.8).
Large Battles Micro Training lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,002 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Large Battles Micro Training by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.