WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Hell Of Ruin
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Hell Of Ruin

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,530 recorded sessions versus 39. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 3.2), suggesting larger games. Hell Of Ruin lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Hell Of Ruin
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeHell Of Ruin
Total sessions18,530 39
Unique hosts1,615 13
Avg players/lobby5.2 3.2
Avg lobby open time1.6 min1.5 min
Sessions (30d)9,768 38
Tracked versions715
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
5
Jun 26
10,531
38

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Hell Of Ruin on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,530 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 39 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Hell Of Ruin (3.2).
Hell Of Ruin lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,768 vs 38). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Hell Of Ruin by 13. Direct Strike has the wider host base.