WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Gggf
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Gggf

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 16. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.1 min for Gggf. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Gggf
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeGggf
Total sessions47,450 16
Unique hosts1,615 1
Avg players/lobby5.3 3
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 2.1 min
Sessions (30d)9,793 16
Tracked versions1042
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
13,846
16

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Gggf on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 16 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Gggf (3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.1 min for Gggf. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,793 vs 16). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Gggf by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.