WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Divideandconquers
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Divideandconquers

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 22,210 recorded sessions versus 18. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 2 min for Divideandconquers. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Divideandconquers
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeDivideandconquers
Total sessions22,210 18
Unique hosts1,615 2
Avg players/lobby5.2 1
Avg lobby open time1.6 min 2 min
Sessions (30d)9,629 12
Tracked versions811
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 19, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
9
Jun 26
14,271
14

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Divideandconquers on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 22,210 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 18 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Divideandconquers (1).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 2 min for Divideandconquers. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,629 vs 12). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Divideandconquers by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.