WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,430 recorded sessions versus 4. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeDivideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai
Total sessions47,430 4
Unique hosts1,615 1
Avg players/lobby5.3 1
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.9 min
Sessions (30d)10,032 0
Tracked versions1041
Last hostedJul 10, 2026May 20, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
13,801
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,430 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai (1).
Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.9 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,032 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Divideandconquer Sigmabx Overhaul Amai by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.