WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Divideandconquer
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Divideandconquer

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,488 recorded sessions versus 666. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.3 min for Divideandconquer. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Divideandconquer
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeDivideandconquer
Total sessions47,488 666
Unique hosts1,615 217
Avg players/lobby5.3 1.5
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 2.3 min
Sessions (30d)9,755 249
Tracked versions10411
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
269
Jun 26
30,642
808
Jul 26
14,415
378

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Divideandconquer on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,488 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 666 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Divideandconquer (1.5).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.3 min for Divideandconquer. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,755 vs 249). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Divideandconquer by 217. Direct Strike has the wider host base.