WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Divide And Conquer
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Divide And Conquer

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 22,499 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 4.7 min for Divide And Conquer. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Divide And Conquer
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeDivide And Conquer
Total sessions22,499 3
Unique hosts1,615 2
Avg players/lobby5.2 2.3
Avg lobby open time1.6 min 4.7 min
Sessions (30d)10,040 1
Tracked versions812
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 14, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
14,561
3

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Divide And Conquer on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 22,499 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Divide And Conquer (2.3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 4.7 min for Divide And Conquer. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,040 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Divide And Conquer by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.