WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 357. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 2.3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.7 min for @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01
Head to Head
MetricDirect Strike@Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01
Total sessions47,450 357
Unique hosts1,615 44
Avg players/lobby5.3 2.3
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 3.7 min
Sessions (30d)9,748 30
Tracked versions1043
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
6
Jun 26
30,642
567
Jul 26
14,147
42

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01 on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 357 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01 (2.3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.7 min for @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,748 vs 30). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and @Disrpgv.B3.32ref Eng V 3c1.01 by 44. Direct Strike has the wider host base.