WC3 TrackerMapsDbz Maul vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Dbz Maul vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,530 recorded sessions versus 2. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Dbz Maul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Dbz Maul Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricDbz MaulDirect Strike
Total sessions218,530
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby15.2
Avg lobby open time0.4 min 1.6 min
Sessions (30d)29,800
Tracked versions271
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
2
10,531

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Dbz Maul and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,530 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Dbz Maul (1).
Dbz Maul lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,800 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Dbz Maul has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.