WC3 TrackerMapsDarwin'S Island Tft vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Darwin'S Island Tft vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,430 recorded sessions versus 30. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3.2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.4 min for Darwin'S Island Tft. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Darwin'S Island Tft Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricDarwin'S Island TftDirect Strike
Total sessions3047,430
Unique hosts71,615
Avg players/lobby3.25.3
Avg lobby open time4.4 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)210,027
Tracked versions10104
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
30
30,642
Jul 26
2
13,801

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Darwin'S Island Tft and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,430 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 30 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Darwin'S Island Tft (3.2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.4 min for Darwin'S Island Tft. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,027 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Darwin'S Island Tft has been hosted by 7 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.