WC3 TrackerMapsCustomteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00 vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00 vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.5 min for Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00 Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricCustomteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00Warofraces
Total sessions47,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby34.6
Avg lobby open time6.5 min4 min
Sessions (30d)21,589
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
2
2,252

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00 and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00 (3).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 6.5 min for Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,589 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Customteamsurvivalenchancedz1.00 has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.