WC3 TrackerMapsCounter Attack vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Counter Attack vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,587 recorded sessions versus 7. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.1), suggesting larger games. Counter Attack lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Counter Attack Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCounter AttackDirect Strike
Total sessions747,587
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby1.15.3
Avg lobby open time0.7 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)19,859
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
7
14,529

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Counter Attack and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,587 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Counter Attack (1.1).
Counter Attack lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,859 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Counter Attack has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.