WC3 TrackerMapsCorona vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Corona vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.9 min for Corona. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Corona Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricCoronaWarofraces
Total sessions57,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby24.6
Avg lobby open time4.9 min4 min
Sessions (30d)01,586
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
5
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,240

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Corona and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Corona (2).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.9 min for Corona. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,586 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Corona has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.