WC3 TrackerMapsCo Op Mission Belf vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Co Op Mission Belf vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 9. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.8), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 9 min for Co Op Mission Belf. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Co Op Mission Belf Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricCo Op Mission BelfWarofraces
Total sessions97,637
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby3.84.6
Avg lobby open time9 min4 min
Sessions (30d)11,583
Tracked versions237
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,367

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Co Op Mission Belf and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 9 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Co Op Mission Belf (3.8).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 9 min for Co Op Mission Belf. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,583 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Co Op Mission Belf has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.