WC3 TrackerMapsClose Quarter Battle vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Close Quarter Battle vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,635 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Close Quarter Battle lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Close Quarter Battle Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricClose Quarter BattleWarofraces
Total sessions47,635
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby14.6
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,667
Tracked versions137
Last hostedMay 17, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,217

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Close Quarter Battle and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,635 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Close Quarter Battle (1).
Close Quarter Battle lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,667 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Close Quarter Battle has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.