WC3 TrackerMapsCircle Td Eternal 1.3d.F vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 26. Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F averages more players per lobby (5.6 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.6 min for Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricCircle Td Eternal 1.3d.FWarofraces
Total sessions267,636
Unique hosts5258
Avg players/lobby5.6 4.6
Avg lobby open time4.6 min4 min
Sessions (30d)271,566
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
2
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
26
2,304

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 26 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F has more players per lobby on average (5.6) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 4.6 min for Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,566 vs 27). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F has been hosted by 5 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.